The Washington Sun

Main Navigation

Subscribe Log in
  • Newsletters
    • Sign up for our newsletters
    • The Washington Sun newsletter
    • Afternoon Sun
    • Metro
    • Sign up for Dana Milbank’s newsletter
    • Sign up for Matt K. Lewis’ newsletter
  • Weather
  • Campaigns
    • 2026 Election
    • 2028 Election
    • Democrats
    • Republicans
    • Influence
  • Congress
    • House
    • Senate
  • Metro
    • Latest in Metro
    • Tom Sietsema
  • Sports
    • Latest in Sports
    • All-DMV High School
  • Policy
    • Administration
    • Defense
    • Energy & Environment
    • Immigration
    • Economy
    • Health
    • Foreign Policy
    • Housing
    • Technology
  • National
    • Legal
    • U.S. News
  • Perspectives
    • Latest Perspectives
    • Dana Milbank
    • Matt K. Lewis
    • Features
    • Forums
  • Podcast
    • Washington Sun Cast • Episode List
    • Listen on Apple Podcasts
    • Listen on Spotify
    • Watch on Youtube
  • Who Are We?
    • About The Washington Sun
    • Events
    • Work for us
    • Press Releases
    • Support FAQ
  • Follow Us
    • X (Twitter)
    • Bluesky
    • LinkedIn
    • Instagram
    • TikTok
    • YouTube
Subscribe
Log in

Support independent journalism. Subscribe for $50 for your first year. Limited time.

Health Care

White House Proposes Cutting Hospital Payments for Scans

Hospitals would no longer be able to collect bigger Medicare payments than doctors do for routine scans like ultrasounds and MRIs.

Donald Trump

The White House proposed having Medicare reduce payments to hospitals for routine imaging services. (Mark Schiefelbein/AP)

By Paige Winfield Cunningham

July 2, 2026 08:45 a.m.

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Copy
    Link copied

Seniors could pay less starting in January for X-rays, ultrasounds, MRIs or other scans administered in a hospital under a proposal released Thursday by the Trump administration.

Medicare intends to reduce payments to hospitals for routine imaging services, putting them on par with what it pays doctor’s offices for the same services, according to two White House officials who detailed the proposed rule for NOTUS.

It’s the Trump administration’s most aggressive move yet to curb Medicare payments to hospitals, which receive two to four times more on average than doctor’s offices for identical outpatient procedures and who have played an outsized role in driving up health-care spending in the United States.

Past administrations and Congress have taken incremental steps to equalize hospital and doctor’s office payments, something called “site-neutral” payments. These efforts have engendered sharp opposition by hospitals, which argue they serve sicker, more complex patients and are subject to larger overhead and licensing costs than independent physician’s offices.

Trending

  • Capitol Hill Montessori at Logan

    At D.C.’s Only Public Montessori School, Parents Are Feeling Betrayed

  • Election 2026 Michigan

    CNN Panelists Worry for Haley Stevens After ‘Painful’ Interview

  • Meridian Hill Park

    Why Doesn’t D.C. Have More Control Over Its Parks?

  • Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool

    Trump Plans to Deliver Closing Election Remarks at the Reflecting Pool

The administration “is very interested in pushing the envelope on how far we can get on site-neutral because we think it is very good policy,” a White House official said.

Hospitals are increasingly acquiring independent doctor’s offices. When a doctor’s office is acquired, it can start billing Medicare at the higher hospital rate – even if the office isn’t physically in a hospital building.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services estimates the payment cuts would save the Medicare trust fund $9.5 billion over a decade. The rate cuts wouldn’t apply to scans in which the patient swallows or is injected with contrast agents like dyes to make blood vessels and tissues more visible.

The Congressional Budget Office has estimated the policy applied to all scans – including those in which contrast agents are used – would result in $7.6 billion in savings over a similar window.

Medicare patients would also save on out-of-pocket costs since they typically have to cover 20 percent coinsurance.

The proposal, which is part of a larger annual regulation on hospital outpatient payments, isn’t final and must go through a public comment period. It would go into effect Jan. 1.

Site-neutral payments have bipartisan appeal. Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-Louisiana) and Maggie Hassan (D-New Hampshire) introduced a broad framework for it in late 2024.

Last year, the administration applied “site-neutral” payments to drug administration services – like chemotherapy and other injections – provided at off-campus hospital outpatient departments.

Author

STAFF_Paige Winfield Cunningham_MUG-500px.png Paige Winfield Cunningham is a reporter at The Washington Sun.

The Latest

  • Spirit Trinity Rodman

    Spirit Beat Chicago, 2-0, Earn No. 3 Seed in NWSL Playoffs

  • Odafe Oweh

    Washington’s Much-Maligned Defense Just Helped Rescue Its Season

  • AP26085044401762

    The NRCC Is Spending Over $100 Million on Coordinated Campaign Ads

  • Campaign signs supporting California Proposition 40.

    California Is Testing the Appetite for a Wealth Tax

  • Meridian Hill Park

    Why Doesn’t D.C. Have More Control Over Its Parks?

Welcome back to The Washington Sun!

You can always update your profile and newsletters preferences on the My Account page.

Manage account settings

Welcome to
The Washington Sun

Subscribe to maintain unlimited access to independent journalism covering Washington's people, politics and power.

Continue to checkout ↗
  • About The Washington Sun
  • Work for us
  • Terms of Use
  • Subscription Agreement Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your CA Privacy Rights
  • Support FAQ
  • Contact us

© 2026.0 NOTUS MEDIA, LLC