The Washington Sun

Main Navigation

Subscribe Log in
  • Newsletters
    • Sign up for our newsletters
    • The Washington Sun newsletter
    • Afternoon Sun
    • Metro
    • Sign up for Dana Milbank’s newsletter
    • Sign up for Matt K. Lewis’ newsletter
  • Weather
  • Campaigns
    • 2026 Election
    • 2028 Election
    • Democrats
    • Republicans
    • Influence
  • Congress
    • House
    • Senate
  • Metro
    • Latest in Metro
    • Tom Sietsema
  • Sports
    • Latest in Sports
    • All-DMV High School
  • Policy
    • Administration
    • Defense
    • Energy & Environment
    • Immigration
    • Economy
    • Health
    • Foreign Policy
    • Housing
    • Technology
  • National
    • Legal
    • U.S. News
  • Perspectives
    • Latest Perspectives
    • Dana Milbank
    • Matt K. Lewis
    • Features
    • Forums
  • Podcast
    • Washington Sun Cast • Episode List
    • Listen on Apple Podcasts
    • Listen on Spotify
    • Watch on Youtube
  • Who Are We?
    • About The Washington Sun
    • Events
    • Work for us
    • Press Releases
    • Support FAQ
  • Follow Us
    • X (Twitter)
    • Bluesky
    • LinkedIn
    • Instagram
    • TikTok
    • YouTube
Subscribe
Log in

Support independent journalism. Subscribe for $50 for your first year. Limited time.

Trump White House

Justice Department Says the Presidential Records Act Is Unconstitutional

The new opinion could allow the White House to set up its own records system outside established law.

Department of Justice

The Justice Department issued an opinion this week declaring the Presidential Records Act unconstitutional. Rahmat Gul/AP

By Torrie Herrington

April 2, 2026 09:14 p.m.

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Copy
    Link copied

The Department of Justice has determined that the decades-old Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional, a decision that could allow the White House to create its own system to choose which records must be retained after President Donald Trump leaves office.

The department’s Office of Legal Counsel issued a 52-page opinion earlier this week, signed by Trump appointee T. Elliot Gaiser, arguing the records act oversteps Congress’ authority.

“The PRA is unconstitutional for two independent but interlocking reasons: It exceeds Congress’s enumerated and implied powers, and it aggrandizes the Legislative Branch at the expense of the constitutional independence and autonomy of the Executive,” the opinion reads.

“It serves no identifiable and valid legislative purpose. It exceeds any preservation power because Congress cannot preserve presidential records merely for the sake of posterity. It exceeds Congress’s regulatory power over statutory agencies because it purports to regulate a constitutional office — the Presidency — that Congress did not create and that Congress cannot abolish,” it continues.

Trending

  • Marco Rubio and Donald Trump

    State Asked Foreign Service Officers Up for Promotion Whether They Voted for Trump

  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

    HHS Was Caught With Erroneous Legal Citations

  • Aviator House opening

    A New Lease on Life for D.C.’s Vacant Offices

  • Election 2026 Kansas Senate

    Democrats Aim to Build Red State Momentum With an Epstein Ad Blitz

Sign Up for NOTUS’ Free Daily Newsletter

The act was signed into law by then-President Jimmy Carter after the Watergate scandal, which revealed illegal surveillance and a sabotage campaign by Richard Nixon’s reelection committee.

The DOJ opinion is legal guidance to the White House and not a change to the law, which would require congressional action.

The opinion argues Trump does not have to turn over his presidential records to the National Archives at the end of his administration, because the 1978 law is “untethered from any valid and identifiable legislative purpose.”

A White House spokesperson told The Washington Post that the president is “committed to preserving records from his historic Administration and he will maintain a rigorous records retention program.”

The Presidential Records Act is of particular interest to Trump after he was indicted in 2023 on charges he retained dozens of boxes of classified material in a bathroom of his Mar-a-Lago home after leaving office.

Trump’s attorneys argued that the Presidential Records Act allowed him to designate which files were personal versus presidential.

Eventually, the case was dismissed by Judge Aileen Cannon, ruling that the appointment of Jack Smith as special counsel was unconstitutional, and dropped by the DOJ after Trump won his second term.

Author

AJI-Fellow2025_Torrie Herrington.png Torrie Herrington is a reporter at The Washington Sun and an Allbritton Journalism Institute fellow.

The Latest

  • Dan Sullivan

    Trump Administration Lays Out a Path to Challenge Alaska’s Senate Results

  • Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries speak to reporters.

    Democrats Warn Economy — Not Impeachment — Should Drive Agenda

  • US Australia Hegseth

    Hegseth Issues Directive to Stop Soldiers From Betting on Prediction Markets

  • Cam Booser

    This Brewers-Rays World Series Is the Brainiac Classic

  • Voters stand in line at an early voting location in a mall in Anchorage, Alaska.

    Democrats Are Losing Trust in Mail-In Ballots

Welcome back to The Washington Sun!

You can always update your profile and newsletters preferences on the My Account page.

Manage account settings

Welcome to
The Washington Sun

Subscribe to maintain unlimited access to independent journalism covering Washington's people, politics and power.

  • About The Washington Sun
  • Work for us
  • Terms of Use
  • Subscription Agreement Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your CA Privacy Rights
  • Support FAQ
  • Contact us

© 2026.0 NOTUS MEDIA, LLC