D.C. voters opening their mail-in ballots are encountering a fundamental shift in the at-large council race: the pick-two era is officially over.
District residents used ranked-choice voting for the first time in June’s primary under Initiative 83, the voter-approved ballot measure that overhauled city elections. But applying the system to November’s general election — where two citywide council seats are on the line — is creating fresh confusion as ballots land in mailboxes.
For decades, the at-large ballot carried simple instructions: vote for no more than two candidates. Under the new system, voters face a grid prompting them to rank candidates across columns from first to fifth choice. Yet because each ballot contains only one active vote at a time, a voter’s second choice may never be counted.
The new math has forced candidates to reshape their messaging in the home stretch, with contenders aggressively pleading for first-choice votes. The change has also bred friction among voters accustomed to casting two distinct picks, leaving even politically plugged-in residents puzzling over their ballots.
Trending
Sign up for The Washington Sun Metro newsletter for essential coverage of the D.C. region.
Rick Reinhard, an 80-year-old Mount Pleasant resident who closely tracks local politics, was among those left scratching his head when his ballot arrived last week.
“There was no indication on the ballot that we get one vote for two seats,” Reinhard said. “You rank people, but there are two seats. How does that work?”
What election officials confirmed to The Washington Sun gets to the heart of the disconnect: Under the city’s new rules, voters no longer cast two distinct votes. Instead, each ballot carries only one active vote at a time. If the voter’s top choice leads the field and wins a seat, that ballot stays locked with that frontrunner — meaning secondary choices marked for the second open seat are never used.
A Charter Quirk Meets Partisan Reality
The mathematical friction stems from a unique structural feature of D.C. governance. Under the 1973 Home Rule Act, Congress mandated that two of the D.C. Council’s four at-large seats be reserved for non-majority party members. To adhere to that law, the District combines a two-seat contest into a single ranked race rather than holding separate elections.
Under D.C.’s vote-counting rules, candidates with the lowest totals are eliminated round by round, transferring their ballots to lower-ranked choices until two candidates remain standing. But those vote transfers only happen for voters whose initial choices get knocked out. If a frontrunner stays in the lead and wins the first seat, those ballots freeze — leaving the second seat to be decided without those voters’ input.
In heavily Democratic D.C., that system creates a unique political headache. The Democratic at-large nominee, Oye Owolewa, is widely expected to draw a dominant share of first-choice votes. Because those ballots stay locked with Owolewa throughout tabulation, Democratic voters who rank him first effectively surrender their say in deciding which candidate wins the second open seat.
This dynamic has shattered traditional campaign playbooks. In previous elections, voters could easily split their two selections between a Democrat and an independent candidate. Now, because a top-choice vote for a frontrunner swallows down-ballot power, candidates are locked into a zero-sum fight for the top spot.
Independent incumbent Elissa Silverman has shifted her strategy to explicitly warn supporters that ranking the Democratic nominee first invalidates their vote for her, urging them instead to “Rank Elissa #1.” Owolewa, meanwhile, is leaning into the city’s deep-blue electorate, encouraging voters to lock in his victory by making him their first choice.
The D.C. Council’s chair, Phil Mendelson, says he saw the coming dilemma over the summer. In a July memo to council members, he explicitly warned that under standard ranked choice rules, “voters may not meaningfully participate in the selection of both At-Large members.”
He further drafted emergency legislation in July that would have established a “multi-pass” system — running a second full count after removing the first winner to ensure every voter had a say on both seats. But Mendelson withdrew the measure before summer recess, citing timing constraints before ballots were finalized and stiff resistance from Initiative 83 architects who insisted the general election proceed under the standard rules approved by voters.
“The people who were behind the initiative said, ‘We intended it this way and don’t want it changed,’” Mendelson told The Sun.
Education Delays
Compounding voter confusion is a delay in official public outreach. The executive director of the D.C. Board of Elections, Monica Evans, acknowledged to The Sun that official education materials, including mailers and palm cards, are running behind schedule due to bureaucratic red tape tied to the start of the city’s new fiscal year. Evans said the board is launching an emergency outreach push via social media and community events as mail-in ballots arrive and voters start making decisions.
Initiative 83 proponents maintain that District voters are well-equipped to navigate ranked-choice ballots, pointing to June’s primary as proof. In a post-primary Survey USA poll commissioned by the national advocacy group FairVote, 78% of D.C. voters said their ranked-choice ballot was simple to complete, while 71% said they understood the system well. Advocates also point out that even with the option to pick two candidates under the old system, many residents regularly cast a vote for only a single at-large candidate anyway.
However, June’s primary featured standard, single-winner contests across the board. November’s at-large race presents a far trickier multi-seat environment.
Brian Strege, the board chair for Grow Democracy DC who helped lead the Initiative 83 campaign, explained that campaign architects deliberately chose single-vote counting over alternative multi-winner systems — like those in other cities that transfer surplus votes in fractional decimals — to keep the vote counting simple for residents.
“We wanted to keep the ballot straightforward and avoid complex, fractional-vote systems,” Strege said.
For now, District voters will navigate the new grid as designed. As for whether the council will revisit the at-large counting structure after the general election, Mendelson indicated that lawmakers will wait to see how the system functions in practice.
“Let’s see how the election goes,” Mendelson said.
Author
