The Washington Sun

Main Navigation

Subscribe Log in
  • Newsletters
    • Sign up for our newsletters
    • The Washington Sun newsletter
    • Afternoon Sun
    • Metro
    • Sign up for Dana Milbank’s newsletter
    • Sign up for Matt K. Lewis’ newsletter
  • Weather
  • Campaigns
    • 2026 Election
    • 2028 Election
    • Democrats
    • Republicans
    • Influence
  • Congress
    • House
    • Senate
  • Metro
    • Latest in Metro
    • Tom Sietsema
  • Sports
    • Latest in Sports
    • All-DMV High School
  • Policy
    • Administration
    • Defense
    • Energy & Environment
    • Immigration
    • Economy
    • Health
    • Foreign Policy
    • Housing
    • Technology
  • National
    • Legal
    • U.S. News
  • Perspectives
    • Latest Perspectives
    • Dana Milbank
    • Matt K. Lewis
    • Features
    • Forums
  • Podcast
    • Washington Sun Cast • Episode List
    • Listen on Apple Podcasts
    • Listen on Spotify
    • Watch on Youtube
  • Who Are We?
    • About The Washington Sun
    • Events
    • Work for us
    • Press Releases
    • Support FAQ
  • Follow Us
    • X (Twitter)
    • Bluesky
    • LinkedIn
    • Instagram
    • TikTok
    • YouTube
Subscribe
Log in

Support independent journalism. Subscribe for $50 for your first year. Limited time.

House

Republicans Pass Bill Boosting Immigration Enforcement

The party-line bill did not include any provision to address Trump’s $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund.

Congress passed increased funding for the Customs and Border Control, which patrols the U.S. border wall in Nogales, AZ.

Congress passed funding for the Customs and Border Control, which patrols the U.S. border wall in Nogales, AZ. Charlie Riedel/AP

By Stephen Neukam

June 9, 2026 05:29 p.m.

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Copy
    Link copied

House Republicans on Tuesday narrowly passed a party-line bill that provides $70 billion for immigration and border agencies, despite lingering concerns over not blocking President Donald Trump’s $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund.

“The bill we have in the House does not have any funding for a weaponization fund,” House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said Tuesday. The bill, however, does not explicitly ban the fund’s creation as some lawmakers had hoped.

The spending legislation passed through the budget reconciliation process, which allowed it to move without the threat of a filibuster. House Republicans voted, 214-212, to send the bill to Trump, who is expected to sign it.

The House action comes after the immigration funding package was derailed in the Senate last month after the Justice Department announced a settlement between Trump and the IRS over a leak of his tax documents.

Trending

  • Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Energy Secretary Chris Wright

    Trump Aides Are Leaning on U.S. Firms to Accept Russian Diesel

  • Northampton, Mass. mainstreet

    In a Western Massachusetts Town, Everyone Is Someone Else’s Fascist

  • 
AP 26230499794946

    Is There a Reason There Are So Many Dan Sullivans in Alaska? An Investigation.

  • Brewers World Series

    A World Series That Reminded Us Just How Good Baseball Can Be

The proposed deal would have created an “anti-weaponization” fund that Trump could use to make direct payouts to victims of political weaponization, an idea that drew opposition from both parties and criticism that it was a “slush fund.” Republican senators raised concerns that the fund could be used to compensate Jan. 6 Capitol rioters.

Amid those worries, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said last week that the DOJ would not create the fund. With that promise Senate Republicans were able to beat back multiple floor amendments that would have limited or blocked the fund through the reconciliation package.

Trump himself has contradicted Blanche, saying on Meet the Press on Sunday that the “anti-weaponization” fund remains a “great idea” and he would be disappointed if it did not move ahead. His comments did not weaken support for the fund in the House.

But House moderates are still working to prevent such a fund. Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pennsylvania) and Tom Suozzi (D-New York) are collecting signatures for a discharge petition to force a vote on a bill that would ban the “anti-weaponization” fund. If a majority of House lawmakers signed onto the petition, the chamber would have to vote on the proposal.

The reconciliation accord funds Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection, both of which were left out of a deal with Democrats in April to fund the Department of Homeland Security.

Senate Democrats have refused to fund ICE and other agencies without reforms from the administration. That stalemate left DHS closed for over two months earlier this year. The GOP circumvented that opposition by moving the funding through reconciliation, and those dollars will be enough to cover the agencies through the end of Trump’s term.

The final bill did not include public funding for the construction of Trump’s White House ballroom, after it initially proposed $1 billion for the project. The push to include federal funding for the ballroom was also met with bipartisan pushback, after Trump first said he planned to pay for the East Wing addition with private donations.

Author

STAFF_Stephen Neukam_MUG-500px.png Stephen Neukam is a reporter at The Washington Sun.

The Latest

  • Trump arch protest

    D.C., Virginia Sue Trump Adminstration Over Proposed Triumphal Arch

  • hundred.dollar.bills.money

    A Super PAC Army Is Spending Millions on ‘Spoiler’ Candidates

  • AP26140062334043

    Josh Shapiro Already Sounds Like He’s Running for President

  • Brewers World Series

    A World Series That Reminded Us Just How Good Baseball Can Be

  • Austin Ekeler

    Austin Ekeler Has a Media Future Ahead of Him. But Football Is First.

Welcome back to The Washington Sun!

You can always update your profile and newsletters preferences on the My Account page.

Manage account settings

Welcome to
The Washington Sun

Subscribe to maintain unlimited access to independent journalism covering Washington's people, politics and power.

Continue to checkout ↗
  • About The Washington Sun
  • Work for us
  • Terms of Use
  • Subscription Agreement Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your CA Privacy Rights
  • Support FAQ
  • Contact us

© 2026.0 NOTUS MEDIA, LLC