The Washington Sun

Main Navigation

Subscribe Log in
  • Newsletters
    • Sign up for our newsletters
    • The Washington Sun newsletter
    • Afternoon Sun
    • Metro
    • Sign up for Dana Milbank’s newsletter
    • Sign up for Matt K. Lewis’ newsletter
  • Weather
  • Campaigns
    • 2026 Election
    • 2028 Election
    • Democrats
    • Republicans
    • Influence
  • Congress
    • House
    • Senate
  • Metro
    • Latest in Metro
    • Tom Sietsema
  • Sports
    • Latest in Sports
    • All-DMV High School
  • Policy
    • Administration
    • Defense
    • Energy & Environment
    • Immigration
    • Economy
    • Health
    • Foreign Policy
    • Housing
    • Technology
  • National
    • Legal
    • U.S. News
  • Perspectives
    • Latest Perspectives
    • Dana Milbank
    • Matt K. Lewis
    • Features
    • Forums
  • Podcast
    • Washington Sun Cast • Episode List
    • Listen on Apple Podcasts
    • Listen on Spotify
    • Watch on Youtube
  • Who Are We?
    • About The Washington Sun
    • Events
    • Work for us
    • Press Releases
    • Support FAQ
  • Follow Us
    • X (Twitter)
    • Bluesky
    • LinkedIn
    • Instagram
    • TikTok
    • YouTube
Subscribe
Log in

Support independent journalism. Subscribe for $50 for your first year. Limited time.

Donald Trump

Trump’s Mail-In Ballots Plan Blocked by Judge Yet Again

The federal judge’s ruling came hours after the U.S. Postal Service said Trump’s order was in effect.

President Donald Trump speaks to reporters.

In her ruling Thursday, Talwani said plaintiff states faced a prohibitively short timeline to follow through with the rule’s demands. (Pool via AP)

By Angie Orellana Hernandez

August 28, 2026 08:53 a.m.

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Copy
    Link copied

A federal judge on Thursday again blocked President Donald Trump’s crackdown on mail-in ballots, in an order that came down shortly after the U.S. Postal Service said the new requirements were in effect following a protracted legal battle.

U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani’s ruling is likely to be appealed by the Trump administration, further delaying implementation of an executive order that, if allowed to move forward, would have profound implications for this year’s midterm elections. Under Trump’s order, the Postal Service would compare ballots sent through the mail to a list of eligible voters created by the federal government.

In her ruling Thursday, Talwani said plaintiff states faced a prohibitively short timeline to follow through with the rule’s demands and blocked it for at least 14 days. The next hearing in the case is scheduled for Sept. 3.

“Plaintiff States have neither time nor funds to design new mail ballots, seek approval of the new designs, order production of mail ballots, update their own election management systems, train election officials to use the USPS portal, and upload citizen data to the portal, all before the midterms,” Talwani wrote.

Trending

  • Secretary of War Pete Hegseth attends an NCAA college football game

    Soldiers Are Already Looking for a Way Out of Hegseth’s Livestreamed Firing Squad

  • Jonathan Nez

    Trump-Aligned Super PAC Ran an Ad Attacking a Native American Candidate — Featuring the Wrong Person

  • President Donald Trump welcomes Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

    The U.S. Has Kept Its Distance From the Saudi-Houthi Fight, But Can That Last?

  • FBI Director Kash Patel

    FBI Is Angling to Hand the UFC a No-Bid Contract to Train Agents

Trump signed an executive order in March that sought to redefine the federal government’s role in the election process. Nearly two dozen states and the District of Columbia swiftly sued, arguing the order was a violation of their constitutional rights to administer elections.

Talwani, an Obama appointee, blocked parts of Trump’s order in two separate cases filed in Boston earlier this summer. But the Supreme Court halted Talwani’s injunction on Monday, finding that she had acted too soon because federal agencies had not yet implemented the executive order.

The Supreme Court’s order did not decide whether Trump’s policy mandates were lawful, but it did provide a temporary win for the president’s administration.

The Postal Service acknowledged Thursday there was “pending litigation” on the final rule and would continue to provide updates “as necessary.”

Author

NOTUS - Angie Orellana Hernandez Headshot Angie Orellana Hernandez is a reporter at The Washington Sun.

The Latest

  • Jonathan Nez

    Trump-Aligned Super PAC Ran an Ad Attacking a Native American Candidate — Featuring the Wrong Person

  • James Talarico

    Democrats Hope They Can Ride a ‘Perfect Storm’ in Texas

  • President Donald Trump delivers remarks at the White House.

    Forecasted Hurricane Forces Trump to Change His Football Plans

  • Secretary of War Pete Hegseth attends an NCAA college football game

    Soldiers Are Already Looking for a Way Out of Hegseth’s Livestreamed Firing Squad

  • Capitol Hill Books

    Calling for Satan? Wrong Number.

Welcome back to The Washington Sun!

You can always update your profile and newsletters preferences on the My Account page.

Manage account settings

Welcome to
The Washington Sun

Subscribe to maintain unlimited access to independent journalism covering Washington's people, politics and power.

  • About The Washington Sun
  • Work for us
  • Terms of Use
  • Subscription Agreement Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your CA Privacy Rights
  • Support FAQ
  • Contact us
  • RSS Feed

© 2026.0 NOTUS MEDIA, LLC