The Washington Sun

Main Navigation

Subscribe Log in
  • Newsletters
    • Sign up for our newsletters
    • The Washington Sun newsletter
    • Afternoon Sun
    • Metro
    • Sign up for Dana Milbank’s newsletter
    • Sign up for Matt K. Lewis’ newsletter
  • Weather
  • Campaigns
    • 2026 Election
    • 2028 Election
    • Democrats
    • Republicans
    • Influence
  • Congress
    • House
    • Senate
  • Metro
    • Latest in Metro
    • Tom Sietsema
  • Sports
    • Latest in Sports
    • All-DMV High School
  • Policy
    • Administration
    • Defense
    • Energy & Environment
    • Immigration
    • Economy
    • Health
    • Foreign Policy
    • Housing
    • Technology
  • National
    • Legal
    • U.S. News
  • Perspectives
    • Latest Perspectives
    • Dana Milbank
    • Matt K. Lewis
    • Features
    • Forums
  • Podcast
    • Washington Sun Cast • Episode List
    • Listen on Apple Podcasts
    • Listen on Spotify
    • Watch on Youtube
  • Who Are We?
    • About The Washington Sun
    • Events
    • Work for us
    • Press Releases
    • Support FAQ
  • Follow Us
    • X (Twitter)
    • Bluesky
    • LinkedIn
    • Instagram
    • TikTok
    • YouTube
Subscribe
Log in

Support independent journalism. Subscribe for $50 for your first year. Limited time.

Donald Trump

Pentagon Cannot Remove Transgender Service Members, Appellate Court Says

The D.C. Circuit limited the decision to the four active-duty soldiers who are plaintiffs in the case.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s policy banning transgender soldiers is unconstitutional. Alex Brandon/AP Photo/Alex Brandon

By Torrie Herrington

June 1, 2026 02:53 p.m.

Updated: June 1, 2026 06:31 p.m.

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Copy
    Link copied

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday that a Trump administration policy barring people who are transgender from serving in the military is unconstitutional and “driven by the bare desire to harm a politically unpopular group.”

The three-judge panel split 2-1 in deciding the case, and limited its injunction against the Pentagon policy to only the four transgender plaintiffs currently serving in the military who are facing expulsion, but not the two people who had sought to join. They were challenging a Pentagon policy issued by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, the result of an executive order signed by President Donald Trump on Jan. 27, 2025.

In the majority decision, Judge Robert Wilkins, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, wrote that the policy implemented “goes far beyond disqualifying persons currently or recently suffering from gender dysphoria.”

“I conclude that the Hegseth Policy is both arbitrary and based upon animus, and for those reasons the Policy violates Plaintiff-Appellees’ constitutional right to equal protection of the law,” Wilkins wrote.

Trending

  • Election 2026 Trump Commission

    Dana Milbank: 54 Ways Trump Has Tried to Sabotage the Election

  • Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Energy Secretary Chris Wright

    Trump Aides Are Leaning on U.S. Firms to Accept Russian Diesel

  • Senate Democrats

    The Unlikely Resurgence of Kirsten Gillibrand

  • Burgum

    Trump Is Quietly Working to Give Part of Yosemite to a Private Developer

In response, Hegseth posted to X, “See you at SCOTUS,” an acronym for the Supreme Court of the United States.

The appeals court decision upheld a March 2025 ruling by U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes, which concluded that Trump’s executive order to exclude transgender troops from military service probably violates constitutional rights.

The administration appealed after Reyes issued a preliminary injunction.

The Department of Defense referred a request for comment to the Justice Department, which did not immediately respond.

In his dissent, Judge Justin Walker, a Trump appointee, said the court’s majority goes too far and that the judicial branch shouldn’t be setting military policy.

“Only the Executive and Congress are responsible for system-wide military judgments about the composition of the armed forces,” Walker wrote. “The Supreme Court has never assumed that role for itself. Neither has the D.C. Circuit. Not until today.”

This story has been updated to include Hegseth’s social media response.

Author

AJI-Fellow2025_Torrie Herrington.png Torrie Herrington is a reporter at The Washington Sun and an Allbritton Journalism Institute fellow.

The Latest

  • Trump

    Trump Says Donalds and Moody Called to Ask Him to Approve Florida Hurricane Funding

  • In.God.We.Trust.Money

    Elon Musk, ‘Dark Money’ Help Fuel Record Spending in 2026 Midterms

  • Trump arch protest

    Trump Lawyers Call His Arch a High Priority. Some Veterans Call It Disrespectful.

  • DOJ building in Washington, D.C.

    DOJ Sends Letters Threatening Election Officials Over Records Preservation

  • ICE.Immigration.vest

    Appeals Court Keeps Restrictions on DHS’s Door-Knocking Voter Investigations

Welcome back to The Washington Sun!

You can always update your profile and newsletters preferences on the My Account page.

Manage account settings

Welcome to
The Washington Sun

Subscribe to maintain unlimited access to independent journalism covering Washington's people, politics and power.

Continue to checkout ↗
  • About The Washington Sun
  • Work for us
  • Terms of Use
  • Subscription Agreement Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your CA Privacy Rights
  • Support FAQ
  • Contact us

© 2026.0 NOTUS MEDIA, LLC