The Washington Sun

Main Navigation

Subscribe Log in
  • Newsletters
    • Sign up for our newsletters
    • The Washington Sun newsletter
    • Afternoon Sun
    • Metro
    • Sign up for Dana Milbank’s newsletter
    • Sign up for Matt K. Lewis’ newsletter
  • Weather
  • Campaigns
    • 2026 Election
    • 2028 Election
    • Democrats
    • Republicans
    • Influence
  • Congress
    • House
    • Senate
  • Metro
    • Latest in Metro
    • Tom Sietsema
  • Sports
    • Latest in Sports
    • All-DMV High School
  • Policy
    • Administration
    • Defense
    • Energy & Environment
    • Immigration
    • Economy
    • Health
    • Foreign Policy
    • Housing
    • Technology
  • National
    • Legal
    • U.S. News
  • Perspectives
    • Latest Perspectives
    • Dana Milbank
    • Matt K. Lewis
    • Features
    • Forums
  • Podcast
    • Washington Sun Cast • Episode List
    • Listen on Apple Podcasts
    • Listen on Spotify
    • Watch on Youtube
  • Who Are We?
    • About The Washington Sun
    • Events
    • Work for us
    • Press Releases
    • Support FAQ
  • Follow Us
    • X (Twitter)
    • Bluesky
    • LinkedIn
    • Instagram
    • TikTok
    • YouTube
Subscribe
Log in

Support independent journalism. Subscribe for $50 for your first year. Limited time.

Climate & Environment

Trump Administration Moves to Axe Protection for Undeveloped National Forests

The USDA plans to end the “Roadless Rule,” a prohibition on building roads through about 45 million acres of national forests.

A sign is seen outside U.S. Forest Service headquarters

(Francis Chung/EENews/POLITICO via AP Images)

By Anna Kramer

August 18, 2026 01:39 p.m.

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Copy
    Link copied

The Trump administration moved Tuesday to end 25 years of restrictions that protected the country’s wildest and largest undisturbed forests from construction and logging.

The Agriculture Department announced that it plans to rescind what’s known as the “Roadless Rule,” which prohibits building new roads through the nation’s remaining untouched forests.

President Bill Clinton put the Roadless Rule in place in 2001 after two problems became untenable for the U.S. Forest Service. Most pressing at the time, the agency was failing to maintain the roads that already existed, putting taxpayers on the hook for an increasingly large maintenance backlog bill.

Additionally, new timber and logging projects in untouched areas of national forests were increasingly unpopular with public lands advocates, hunters and conservationists, who warned that many of the country’s iconic ecosystems could fall apart with further development.

Trending

  • AP26265855643072

    Republicans Are Trying to Spend Their Way Out of Disaster in Kansas

  • Jake Johnson

    Dana Milbank: How Big a Wave? This Minnesota Math Teacher Could Be the Democrats’ High-Water Mark.

  • James Comer AP - 26161518592412

    House Republicans Launch Investigation Into D.C. ‘Jury Nullification’

  • Primary Voting D.C.

    D.C. Voters Face a New Math Problem Under Ranked-Choice Voting

The Roadless Rule now protects about 45 million acres of forests, or about one-third of all national forest land managed by the Forest Service.

If the rescission is finalized, it will be easier for the timber industry to push to develop new logging projects in currently untouchable areas that contain millions of acres of valuable, old-growth trees.

USDA said rescinding the Roadless Rule would make it easier for wildland firefighters to build roads to fight fires.

“For too long, outdated restrictions have kept tens of millions of forested acres off-limits to the very treatments that improve forest health and reduce wildfire risk to our communities. Today, we filed a proposal to restore authority to local forest managers who know the land best, removing the barriers that have kept them from doing the work the land demands,” Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said in a statement announcing the rescission.

The federal government already grants some exceptions to the Roadless Rule’s prohibition specifically for fire mitigation near areas where people live.

Many firefighting experts argue that a full rescission of the rule for firefighting reasons does not make sense, because the construction of new roads can lead to an increase in human-caused wildfires. Wilderness areas have the lowest number of wildfire ignitions compared to other types of forested areas, a group of wildland fire experts wrote in a letter to Rollins last year.

Author

Anna Kramer, NOTUS Reporter Anna Kramer is a reporter at The Washington Sun.

The Latest

  • Sen. Brian Schatz

    Schatz Says Democrats Can’t Just Be Voters’ ‘Rebound Boyfriend’

  • AP26265855643072

    Republicans Are Trying to Spend Their Way Out of Disaster in Kansas

  • NY: ICE Agents At LaGuardia Airport

    ICE Won’t Automatically Switch On Body Cameras, Citing Privacy Concerns

  • Primary Voting D.C.

    D.C. Voters Face a New Math Problem Under Ranked-Choice Voting

  • El-Sayed Senate Campaign

    Why Obama Is Going to Detroit: El-Sayed Is Facing Skeptical Black Voters

Welcome back to The Washington Sun!

You can always update your profile and newsletters preferences on the My Account page.

Manage account settings

Welcome to
The Washington Sun

Subscribe to maintain unlimited access to independent journalism covering Washington's people, politics and power.

  • About The Washington Sun
  • Work for us
  • Terms of Use
  • Subscription Agreement Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your CA Privacy Rights
  • Support FAQ
  • Contact us
  • RSS Feed

© 2026.0 NOTUS MEDIA, LLC