The Washington Sun

Main Navigation

Subscribe Log in
  • Newsletters
    • Sign up for our newsletters
    • The Washington Sun newsletter
    • Afternoon Sun
    • Metro
    • Sign up for Dana Milbank’s newsletter
    • Sign up for Matt K. Lewis’ newsletter
  • Weather
  • Campaigns
    • 2026 Election
    • 2028 Election
    • Democrats
    • Republicans
    • Influence
  • Congress
    • House
    • Senate
  • Metro
    • Latest in Metro
    • Tom Sietsema
  • Sports
    • Latest in Sports
    • All-DMV High School
  • Policy
    • Administration
    • Defense
    • Energy & Environment
    • Immigration
    • Economy
    • Health
    • Foreign Policy
    • Housing
    • Technology
  • National
    • Legal
    • U.S. News
  • Perspectives
    • Latest Perspectives
    • Dana Milbank
    • Matt K. Lewis
    • Features
    • Forums
  • Podcast
    • Washington Sun Cast • Episode List
    • Listen on Apple Podcasts
    • Listen on Spotify
    • Watch on Youtube
  • Who Are We?
    • About The Washington Sun
    • Events
    • Work for us
    • Press Releases
    • Support FAQ
  • Follow Us
    • X (Twitter)
    • Bluesky
    • LinkedIn
    • Instagram
    • TikTok
    • YouTube
Subscribe
Log in

Support independent journalism. Subscribe for $50 for your first year. Limited time.

Courts

Pete Hegseth’s Posts Are Making DOJ’s Transgender Military Ban Defense Harder

Administration lawyers are arguing the transgender military ban is not in reality a total ban, while the defense secretary suggests otherwise on X.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth arrives at the Pentagon.

Kevin Wolf/AP

By Jose Pagliery

April 22, 2025 02:06 p.m.

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Copy
    Link copied

Justice Department lawyers insisted in appellate court on Tuesday that the Trump administration is not banning transgender people from the U.S. military — just two days after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth explicitly said the opposite.

That contradiction didn’t come up when government lawyers tried to defend President Donald Trump’s executive order in January that proclaimed “expressing a false ‘gender identity’ divergent from an individual’s sex cannot satisfy the rigorous standards necessary for military service.”

The lawyers argue that the order still allows transgender people to serve in the military, as long as they identify as their sex at birth — and that the president, as commander-in-chief, has the authority to determine what’s best for the military regardless.

But within minutes of the hearing’s start, the three jurists on the panel appeared unconvinced at the way government lawyers tiptoed around the order’s targeting transgender current and incoming service members while simultaneously justifying its legal basis.

Trending

  • eric ueland

    White House Floats Russ Vought’s Deputy to Lead Congress’ Watchdog Arm

  • APTOPIX Washington Extreme Weather Heat

    Trump Raised Big Bucks for Freedom 250 — But Most Events Appear to be Funded by Taxpayers

  • The Capital Grille

    Washington’s Bitter, Partisan Restaurant Divide — With Data

  • President Donald Trump arrives for a campaign rally in Nebraska.

    Trump Wore a Cheap Suit. His Former Tailor Is Ready to Weigh In.

“How can you say that — when somebody who has no medical condition, has never been diagnosed with gender dysphoria but who has transitioned and who lives in a sex other than their birth sex is explicitly banned by the policy? It’s clearly banning all transgender persons,” one judge said.

“I disagree with that last part, your honor,” replied Jason Manion, a counselor to the associate attorney general in D.C.

Manion went on to clarify that the new policy would “allow people who identify as something other than their sex to serve in their sex.” With that phrasing, he meant that the Trump crackdown would allow a transgender person to enter or remain in the military if they stuck with their gender assigned at birth.

While the DOJ team in the appellate court maintained that this policy is not a discriminatory ban on transgender people, that claim was directly contradicted by Hegseth’s recent posts on X.

Hegseth made it clear when responding to a post by Democrats that the scandal-embroiled secretary of defense “needs to go.”

“Your agenda is illegals, trans & DEI — all of which are no longer allowed @ DoD,” Hegseth wrote.

Government lawyers had to address the way Hegseth retweeted a Fox News article on Feb. 27 while quoting the headline “Pentagon says transgender troops are disqualified from service without an exemption.”

In court papers, DOJ lawyers claimed the post “did not announce anything, much less anything inconsistent with the terms of the policy itself.”

During the hearing, one appellate judge asked, “Your argument that this is not a ban on transgender service is that you can serve as a transgender person as long as you don’t serve as a transgender person, is that right?”

D.C. Circuit Judges Gregory G. Katsas, Cornelia T.L. Pillard and Neomi Rao will decide whether to lift a stay imposed by a trial judge that bars the military from implementing Trump’s executive order, which targets transgender people for what it calls the sake of “high standards for troop readiness, lethality, cohesion, honesty, humility, uniformity, and integrity.”

On March 18, Judge Ana C. Reyes froze the policy with a 79-page opinion that noted how the executive order nowhere mentions the term “transgender” but clearly refers to transgender people.

“The president has the power — indeed the obligation — to ensure military readiness. At

times, however, leaders have used concern for military readiness to deny marginalized persons

the privilege of serving,” she wrote.

“[Fill in the blank] is not fully capable and will hinder combat effectiveness; [fill in the blank] will disrupt unit cohesion and so diminish military effectiveness; allowing [fill in the blank] to serve will undermine training, make it impossible to recruit successfully, and disrupt military order. First minorities, then women in combat, then gays filled in that blank. Today, however, our military is stronger and our nation is safer for the millions of such blanks (and all other persons) who serve,” Reyes wrote.

—
Jose Pagliery is a reporter at NOTUS.

Author

Jose Pagliery, NOTUS Reporter Jose Pagliery is a reporter at The Washington Sun.

The Latest

  • Rep. Jared Golden at a news conference.

    Moderate Democrats Propose Banning Pocket Rescissions Once and For All

  • Marco Rubio

    U.S. Hits the International Criminal Court With Sweeping Sanctions

  • Lisa Cook

    Trump Is Renewing His Effort to Oust the Federal Reserve’s Lisa Cook

  • Federal Agents Shooting

    ICE Agents Were Wearing Body Cameras in Marble Hill Shooting, Mullin Says

  • Trae Young AP - 26282082661041

    The New-Look Wizards Made a Good First Impression in Their Preseason Opener

Welcome back to The Washington Sun!

You can always update your profile and newsletters preferences on the My Account page.

Manage account settings

Welcome to
The Washington Sun

Subscribe to maintain unlimited access to independent journalism covering Washington's people, politics and power.

  • About The Washington Sun
  • Work for us
  • Terms of Use
  • Subscription Agreement Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your CA Privacy Rights
  • Support FAQ
  • Contact us
  • RSS Feed

© 2026.0 NOTUS MEDIA, LLC